Commentary and Analysis regarding UN Human Rights Committee General Comment no. 36; the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons; Human Rights, Democracy, and Nuclear Weapons
Available as download below
are witnessing a resurgence of interest in the application of
international human rights law to one of the principal threats to the
human future: nuclear weapons. A general comment issued by the UN Human
Rights Committee in 2018 finds the threat or use of nuclear weapons to
be incompatible with respect for the right to life. The Treaty on the
Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons adopted a year earlier is suffused with a
humanitarian perspective, protects the rights of victims of testing and
use of nuclear arms, and cites human rights law and the principles of
humanity in its preamble.
Committee on Nuclear Policy (LCNP) twice brought together leading
lawyers, law professors, and analysts to reflect on these developments,
in December 2018 and in May 2019. This publication collects papers based
on the speakers’ remarks.
- Prof. Roger Clark of Rutgers Law, LCNP Executive Director Ariana Smith, LCNP President Emeritus Peter Weiss, and Dr. Daniel Rietiker of
the University of Lausanne examine and reflect upon the significance
and implications of the finding of the UN Human Rights Committee.
- Bonnie Docherty of
the Harvard Law International Human Rights Clinic addresses human
rights aspects of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
- Andrew Lichterman of
Western States Legal Foundation explores how human rights discourse
could be a terrain for making connections between disarmament movements
and other movements for a more fair, democratic, and ecologically
publication is highly recommended reading for anyone seeking to
understand how a human rights approach can contribute to the abolition
of nuclear weapons.
List of Issues
Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee During its Periodic
Review of the Russian Federation
129th SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE,
29 JUNE TO 30 JULY 2020
Submitted 1 June 2020
LAWYERS COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR POLICY
www.lcnp.org; johnburroughs [at] lcnp.org
220 E. 49th St., New York, NY 10017 USA
Founded in 1981, LCNP is a nonprofit educational association of lawyers and legalscholars that engages in research and advocacy in support of the global elimination of nuclear weapons and a more just and peaceful world through respect for domestic and international law. LCNP serves as the United Nations office of the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms.
WESTERN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION
655 13th Street, Suite 201, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
in 1982, WSLF is a nonprofit organization that seeks to abolish nuclear weapons
as an essential step in making possible a more secure, just, and
environmentally sustainable world. Grounded in commitments to nonviolence and
international law, WSLF provides independent information and analysis to a wide
range of audiences. WSLF is an affiliateof the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms.
In paragraph 66 of General Comment No. 36 on
the right to life set out in Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), the United Nations Human Rights Committee stated (endnotes
Continue reading “Russian Nuclear Weapons Policy and the Right to Life”
On 30 October 2018, the UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), which is in charge of the implementation of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), has adopted its General Comment (GC) no. 36 relating to the right to life (Article 6 ICCPR). It is in many respects a remarkable document and a new example for bridge-building between nuclear arms control and human rights. In para. 66, the HRC considers the threat and use of WMD, in particular nuclear weapons, incompatible with the right to life and reiterates the duties of the States Parties in the field of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation.
Continute reading Daniel Rietiker’s text:
Click on the button to load the content from safna.org.
Japanese Translation by JALANA:
Read more about the HRC statement here